When I read the stark contrasts between these elite private schools--one embracing technology, one holding fast to 20th-century traditions---I couldn't help but wonder why there couldn't be a middle ground that draws on the strengths of both approaches. Particularly at the elementary-school level, where the world is being unveiled on a daily basis, we know children thrive by touching, exploring, experiencing. You can't eliminate that type of learning nor the importance of play; but, technology can enhance those endeavors. As echoed by both girls, there are situations that call for traditional methods and others that call for technology to enhance the overall experience. Which avenue to pursue depends on the student. High-tech Nina wrote her poems with paper and pencil, while low-tech Nina longed to explore the web links in her arts and science magazine.
Children thrive when provided with choices. Part of being an informed educator is to discern when traditional approaches to learn are most effective and when technology tools are best. I'd say a blended approach can be used in most cases with most children. And within that framework, they teach each other the value of both.
No comments:
Post a Comment